The Systemic Bias of the New Jersey Family Court System - By Michael Volpe

“Yet the court treated me like a second-class citizen because I am a woman and domestic violence survivor..."

"There is a Kafkesque war on motherhood..."

There is systemic bias in New Jersey’s family court system and a group of mothers say they won’t remain silent any longer. The newly formed Mothers Civil Liberties Union (MCLU) is planning on holding a rally in front of the Monmouth County Courthouse on October 30, 2015, to protest against the sex-based discrimination in the New Jersey family court system against mothers.

“One of the first events we decided to organize was the rally both in Monmouth County and in Bergen County at the courthouses,” said Rachel Alintoff, Director of MCLU. “The corruption in both these counties is staggering, filled with racketeering and collusion. Tamara Seidle was murdered by her ex-husband due in part, to the gross animus against women in Monmouth County Courthouse. She was not given protection by the family courts. The justice system failed her and her nine children who are now left without a loving mother.”

Alintoff is a lead plaintiff in a federal law suit against the Monmouth County Family Court system. Alintoff made headlines in the summer when she interrupted an event with Governor Chris Christie to serve the governor with papers related to the lawsuit.

“In my case, Judge Linda Grasso Jones has acted outside her judicial immunity by violating my civil rights, Federal ADA laws concerning my son, Federal bankruptcy laws and annihilated my Constitutional rights.” Alintoff said of her case. “I have been trapped and enslaved by the Monmouth County Courthouse for years where Judge Grasso Jones continues to issue illegal orders against me. My ex is held to a completely different standard than me. It appears that my ex who is a wealthy commodities trader, has paid off the judge.

“My son was ripped from a loving mother and primary caregiver because Judge Grasso Jones cares more about protecting Bryan Alintoff’s money than protecting the welfare of my young autistic son. This was also the case with Judge Justus in Monmouth County Courthouse who was more interested in protecting the career of police officer Philip Seidle than in protecting the beautiful life of Tamara Seidle. Monmouth County has blood on their hands and the public needs to know about it.”

“Family Court is a RICO Enterprise. The family courts are quasi-criminal operating under the guise of being civil courts. The procedural protections are not there. Parents enter the court system unknowing that a Mack truck is about to run them over. We want the parents to reach out to us prior to entering this atrocity. This is Kids for Cash,” said MCLU Executive Director Karin Wolf.

Wolf of nearby Bergen County New Jersey became a trendsetter when she filed a civil RICO lawsuit against the Bergen County Family Court system. That lawsuit also named Christie as a defendant.

Wolf’s lawsuit is being refiled as a class-action lawsuit with Alintoff, Susan Skipp (whose family court case in CT is infamous), and over 200 mothers and children similarly situated, now naming the State of Connecticut and other states as defendants.

“I have not seen or spoken to my two children, Daniel and Gretchen, in 1½ years because my ex employed gun-for-hire Dr. Judith Brown Greif and Bergen County Court Judge Gerald C. Escala, known for foreclosure fraud and having taken a bribe in the Denike v. Cupo case. The Bergen Court dismissed my attorney literally 15 minutes before trial began, and refused to let me present witnesses and hard evidence of child abuse by my ex.” Wolf said. Originally, I was granted a fault-based divorce for domestic violence under N.J.S.A. 2A:34-2(c) Extreme Cruelty, against Edward Crane. However he sought revenge for leaving him, waged a campaign of harassment against me, tortured my kids, and refused to pay proper child support.”

“Yet the court treated me like a second-class citizen because I am a woman and domestic violence survivor, and because the Christie Administration has a political agenda to satiate the bloodlust of the ‘Father’s Rights’ groups. There is cottage industry racket here perpetuated by overzealous disciples of Richard Gardner and his misogynistic, pseudo-scientific theories of Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS). He is the champion of the pedophile and the libertine. The Marquis de Sade would be proud.”

A representative from Bergen County said the court was unaware of Wolf’s lawsuit.

Bergen County’s family court system has been under tremendous fire after the reporting of Paul Nichols of the Bergen County Dispatch.

“Warning to all New Jersey mothers: Leave New Jersey with your kids and don’t give the State of New Jersey any jurisdiction in your family court case, lest you are a glutton for punishment. There is a Kafkaesque war on motherhood,” said Wolf.


#danielcrane  #gretchencrane  #karinwolf

MCLU starts FBI investigation into family court corruption

****ATTENTION****FBI INVESTIGATION INTO FAMILY COURT CORRUPTION IN NJJust got off the phone with the FBI in Newark to...

Posted by Mothers Civil Liberties Union on Tuesday, October 20, 2015

#danielcrane  #gretchencrane  #karinwolf

The Web of Family Court: What You Should Know Before You’re Eaten Alive – By Karin Wolf

“A custody battle is a form of domestic violence. It’s harassment….period."

A custody battle is a form of domestic violence. It’s harassment….period.

In many states, a rapist can sue the victim for custody or parenting time and win, forcing the victim and child to a lifetime of trauma.

Perpetrators of domestic violence often take revenge on their former partners for leaving the relationship and use custody battles to seek revenge and maintain control over their victims. (Stark, Coercive Control; Bancroft, Why Does He Do That? and The Batterer As Parent)

After leaving, a domestic violence victim is most at risk for the two years immediately following the end of the relationship, however a campaign of harassment can last for years, culminating in an abusive custody battle.

Even though there may be a property settlement agreement or consent order defining child custody, courts can and do eradicate the bargained-for terms of these agreements, which abrogates contract law. A family court judge will think nothing of violating a mother’s due process rights – disallowing evidence and witnesses, dismissing attorneys directly before trial, and completely ignoring the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) and the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), inter alia. Motives are often political, involving bribery, racketeering, human trafficking, child prostitution, and child pornography, the latter of which 60% comes from the United States. Child Protective Services (CPS) is part of this racket, as Nancy Schaefer would have been able to tell you, were she not murdered for exposing them.

Bribery is not just the classic slipping of money under the table – it can be anything from business deals, to offering a retiring judge a post-retirement job, to paying off a judge’s real estate properties.

Contrary to de jure law and public policy, there is a de facto policy of discrimination against women and children, especially domestic violence and child abuse/neglect victims, in the family courts. Family courts often engage in domestic violence by proxy, flying in the face of the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) and the Model Code on Domestic and Family Violence (National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges, 1994) .

The segregation of mothers and their children has been achieved via Richard Gardner’s highly-controversial, pseudoscientific theory Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS), which has been rejected repeatedly by the American Psychological Association (APA); and fails Daubert and Frye standards.

Gardner was a misogynist who claimed that when the child(ren) do not want to spend time with the father, it is because the mother is alienating him from the child(ren). This is bogus, a bill of attainder against women. It is natural for a child to prefer the mother, it is simply nature. Look at everything from puppies and kittens to cubs and ducklings.

Moreover, if a child is being abused, that child would naturally not want to be around their abuser. This is simple human nature and a basic human right. It is common sense.

Legitimate scientific studies such as the ACE Study by the Center for Disease Control (CDC) and the Saunders Report commissioned by the United States Department of Justice (USDOJ) have proved that removing a child from the mother and primary attachment figure is a health risk and that the problem is most often a male perpetrator of domestic violence.

The term 'high conflict’ is a misnomer and redirect for what is really domestic violence (Stark). The first thing a court will do is gaslight a domestic violence victim by claiming no domestic violence exists. Father’s rights groups, a.k.a. men’s rights groups, love this concept, as it is a nexus sprung from Parental Alienation Syndrome, because it is way to blame the victim and seek custody to maintain control and dodge paying child support, as well as subjugate women in the larger scope of things.

What is happening in actuality is not Parental Alienation Syndrome targeted at the father, but Tangential Spouse Abuse (Stark and Lischick) and Legal Abuse Syndrome (Huffer) targeted at the mother. The objective is clear.

Father’s rights groups will often pose as families rights groups, but this is simply a ruse. Rest assured, these groups are more intent upon idolizing football players and rap artists for “keeping her in line” and employing Screw the Bitch tactics than anything else.

The two most common accusations a mother will face in a custody battle are 1) Parental Alienation or PAS claims in order to subvert domestic violence, child abuse and neglect, and 2) False accusations that the woman is mentally ill, in order to destroy her credibility.

Both fall under the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA), not because the mother is actually mentally ill, but rather because giving the impression that someone is mentally ill garners protection for that person under the ADA. Under Title II of the ADA, judges are not immune from suit. This is important because family court racketeers often hide behind the cloak of judicial immunity.

Richard Gardner is the champion of the pedophile. He testified in over 400 custody cases. Gardner (1991, p. 118) suggests that Western society’s is “excessively moralistic and punitive” toward pedophiles. Gardner maintains that “the Draconian punishments meted out to pedophiles go far beyond what I consider to be the gravity of the crime.” The current prohibition of sex between adults and children is an “overreaction” which Gardner traces to the Jews.

Organizations such as the Association of Family and Conciliation Courts (AFCC) spread Gardner’s theory like wildfire, training judges, custody evaluators and social workers to disbelieve mothers and children when they report abuse, and worse – separate them as punishment. And what better way to enable pedophilia and other human rights violations than remove the mother as the child’s most natural and fervent protector?

One need only look at a mama bear with her cubs as a prime example of the nature of mothers (and what happens when you mess with them).

PAS opened up a Pandora’s box of corruption – What better way to torture a mother than take away her child? To run a Kids for Cash racket? To distract and control women?

Men’s rights groups are intent upon resurrecting Lord Hale’s Law and the Rule of Thumb, which resonates with the antiquated notion of women and children as chattel.

Mothers are persecuted and marginalized without a legitimate basis, trying to protect their children. Victims may flee to another state with their child(ren) for protection, then face kidnapping charges of whom she bore and nurtured. In actuality, what the mother is doing is self-defense, as self defense includes the defense of others. Public policy on domestic violence states that the mother should not face repercussion, however despite this being the 21st century, mothers are vilified by the court for running off with “his property.” Family court proceedings, though considered civil, are in actuality, quasi-criminal where the mother is selectively prosecuted. This also speaks to Miranda rights.

Child Support and Financial Gaslighting

It is a truth universal, that men do not want to pay child support. It is not uncommon for mother and child(ren) to be denied proper child support in order to bring about bankruptcy of the mother, thus placing them in an untenable financial predicament, then claim she is financially unstable, and give custody to the monied spouse or partner.

It is not uncommon for the judge and father’s attorney to collude in hiding financial information or tweak a financial picture to benefit the male, even when tax returns clearly show otherwise. This is financial gaslighting and is absolutely illegal. In some cases, judges go so far as to order the mother or wife to unwittingly commit insurance fraud by ordering her to amend tax returns and lie to health and car insurance companies, placing her in an untenable predicament.

There are father’s rights organizations, backed by, where men can “donate” items such as cars and boats bought with marital funds, which sets up the bribe. These financial manipulation networks help men evade taxes, circumvent paying money to a soon-to-be ex, and predetermine the outcome of the case.

Wall Streeters are most apt to engage in this racket, employing methodologies concurrent with the 1991 book Screw the Bitch: Divorce Tactics for Men by Dick Hart and Sun Tzu’s The Art of War as popularized by Gordon Gecko’s “Greed is good” phraseology in the 1987 film Wall Street.

This idolization mixed with the greed of the family court system, has resulted in the degradation of human decency and phenomenal financial losses of those affected by Ponzi schemes, foreclosure fraud, and family court fraud and racketeering in violation of the RICO Act of 1972.

Corruption and Social Engineering are nothing new

Don’t assume everyone knows the truth or rather, wants to know it. One of the most common misconceptions is that courts don’t take children away from the mother unless she’s unfit. This is an absolute myth. The reason for this is that the family court crisis is largely absent from the media. Why? Because every media outlet has a legal department acting on behalf of the legal community, not the public interest, advising reporters not to cover family court corruption, and instilling the fear of being sued, despite First Amendment protection of the freedom of the press.

Hitler wrote, “The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. As long as the government is perceived as working for the benefit of the children, the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and almost any deprivation.” – Mein Kampf

Juvenal wrote, “Who will guard the guards themselves?” – Satires (Satire VI, lines 347–8)

Corruption and moral turpitude are running rampant in the family courts. The interests of children should be of paramount importance, but have given way to an abomination of a cottage industry exploiting children for profit and bankrupting the American public. You may wonder how this affects you if you don’t have children, however as you will see, it affects all of us because our civil and constitutional rights as a whole are being destroyed. It is happening in family courts across America, the implications of which are pivotal to the future of this country.

#danielcrane  #gretchencrane  #karinwolf

To watch a scene from the film Gaslight, click below:

To watch the free full-length film Gaslight, click below: